Responsiveness-to-Intervention Symposium

December 4-5, 2003 * Kansas City, Missouri

The National Research Center on Learning Disabilities sponsored this two-day symposium focusing on responsiveness-to-intervention (RTI) issues. The speakers, discussants, and participants assembled represented the wide diversity of individuals with a vested interest in LD determination issues. Advocates, instructional staff, researchers, and state-level education officials brought their collective and considerable expertise to the discussions.

Debra M. Kamps of the Juniper Gardens Children's Project at the University of Kansas presented this invited paper during the symposium. For links to other papers and materials, visit the main Symposium 2003 page.


Formulating Secondary Level Reading Interventions

Previous Page | Next Page
(Abstract) | (Evidence-Based Practices)

Introduction

Recent advances in research and practice concerning emerging/beginning reading skills and 3-tiered school-wide intervention models (i.e., primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention levels) combined with federal policy mandates (i.e., IDEA and No Child Left Behind) have stimulated interest in providing early and intensive intervention services to children at risk for reading and behavior problems as early as kindergarten. Making this possible are new measures for identifying young students not acquiring early basic literacy skills. However, questions regarding exactly how to actually formulate, deliver, sustain, and manage secondary-level interventions remain to be addressed, as do issues of social validation, school resources, and cost. What follows is a discussion of the prevention approach used to formulate secondary- and tertiary-interventions used by the Kansas Center for Early Intervention in Reading and Behavior, initial evidence of effectiveness, and implications for research and practice. Questions guiding formulation and implementation of the secondary interventions used in this project include:

  1. What evidence-based practices/strategies shaped the planning and delivery of secondary reading interventions in local elementary schools?
  2. How large is the school population of students at risk and qualifying for secondary interventions?
  3. What training, professional development, and support is needed to implement, improve, and sustain secondary intervention in local schools, and what is the initial impact on reading instruction?
  4. What is the initial efficacy of secondary intervention for at risk 1st graders in experimental schools over a 3-5 month period?

Previous Page | Next Page
(Abstract) | (Evidence-Based Practices)

IDEAs that Work logo

The symposium was made possible by the support of the U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs. Renee Bradley, Project Officer. Opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the position of the U.S. Department of Education.