References
Aaron, P.G. (1997). The impending demise of the discrepancy formula. Review of Educational Research, 67, 461-502.
Ackerman, P.T., Holloway, C.A., Youngdahl, P.L., & Dykman, R.A. (2001). The double-deficit of reading disability does not fit all. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 152-160.
Algozzine, B. & Ysseldyke, J.E. (1980). Decision makers' prediction of students' academic difficulties as a function of referral information. Journal of Educational Research, 73, 145-150.
Algozzine, R., Ysseldyke, J.E., & McGue, M. (1995). Differentiating low-achieving students: Thoughts on setting the record straight. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 10, 140-144.
Allor, J.H. (2002). The relationship of phonemic awareness and rapid naming on reading development. Learning Disability Quarterly, 25, 47-57.
Artley, A.S., & Hardin, V.L. (1976). A current dilemma: Reading disability or learning disability? The Reading Teacher, 29, 361-366.
Bergmann, G. (1961). Sense and nonsense in operationism. In P.G. Frank (Ed.), The validation of scientific theories (pp. 45-56). New York: Collier.
Braden, J.P., & Kratochwill, T.R. (1997). Treatment utility of assessment: Myths and realities. School Psychology Review, 26, 475-485.
Brophy, J.E. & Good, T.L. (1974). Teacher-student relationships: Causes and consequences. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Buckhalt, J.A. (2002). A short history of g: Psychometrics' most enduring and controversial construct. Learning and Individual Differences, 13, 101-114.
Coutinho, M. (1995). Who will be learning disabled after the reauthorization of IDEA? Two very distinct perspectives. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 664-668.
D'Angiulli, A. & Siegel, L.S. (2003). Cognitive functioning as measured by the WISC-R: Do children with learning disabilities have distinctive patterns of performance? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 48-58.
Dawes, R.M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P.E. (1989). Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science, 243, 1668-1674.
Donahue, W.T., Coombs, C.H., & Travers, R.W.M. (1949). The measurement of student adjustment and achievement. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Ehri, L.C., Nunes, S.R., Stahl, S.R., & Willows, D.M. (2001). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel's meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71, 393-447.
Ehri, L.C., Nunes, S.R., Willows, D.M., Schuster, B.V., Yaghoub-Zadeh, Z., & Shanahan, T. (2001). Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel's meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 250-287.
Finlan, T.G. (1993). Learning disability: The imaginary disease. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
Flanagan, D.P., & Ortiz, S.O. (2001). Essentials of cross-battery assessment. New York: Wiley.
Flanagan, D.P., Ortiz, S.O., Alfonso, V.C., & Mascolo, J.T. (2002). The achievement test desk reference (ATDR): Comprehensive assessment and learning disabilities. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Fletcher, J.M., Francis, D.J., Shaywitz, S.E., Lyon, G.R., Foorman, B.R., Stuebing, K.K., & Shaywitz, B.A. (1998). Intelligent testing and the discrepancy model for children with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 13, 186-203.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., Bahr, M.W., Fernstrom, P., & Stecker, P.M. (1990). Prereferral intervention: A prescriptive approach. Exceptional Children, 56, 493-513.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., Mathes, P.G., Lipsey, M.W., & Roberts, P.H. (2002). Is "learning disabilities" just a fancy term for low achievement? A meta-analysis of reading differences between low achievers with and without the label. In R. Bradley, L. Danielson, and D.P. Hallahan (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 737-762). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. (1998). Treatment validity: A unifying concept for reconceptualizing the identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 13, 204-219.
Gaskins, L.W. (1982). Let's end the reading disabilities/learning disabilities debate. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 15, 81-83.
Gordon, M., Lewandowski, L., & Keiser, S. (1999). The LD label for relatively well-functioning students: A critical analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 485-490.
Gottlieb, J., Alter, M., Gottlieb, B.W., & Wishner, J. (1994). Special education in urban America: It's not justifiable for many. Journal of Special Education, 27, 453-465.
Gresham, F.M. (2002). Responsiveness to intervention: An alternative approach to the identification of learning disabilities. In R. Bradley, L. Danielson, & D.P. Hallahan (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 467-519). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gresham, F.M., MacMillan, D.L., & Bocian, K.M. (1996). Learning disabilities, low achievement, and mild mental retardation: More alike than different? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 570-581.
Hale, J.B. & Fiorello, C.A. (2001). Beyond the academic rhetoric of g: Intelligence testing guidelines for practice. The School Psychologist, 55, 113-139.
Hallahan, D.P. & Mercer, C.D. (2002). Learning disabilities: Historical perspectives. In R. Bradley, L. Danielson, & D.P. Hallahan (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 1-67). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hartman, N.C., & Hartman, R.K. (1973). Perceptual handicap or reading disability? The Reading Teacher, 26, 684-695.
Hinshaw, S. (1992). Academic underachievement, attention deficits, and aggression: Comorbidity and implications for intervention. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 20, 893-903.
Hoskyn, M., & Swanson, H.L. (2000). Cognitive processing of low achievers and children with reading disabilities: A selective meta-analytic review of the published literature. School Psychology Review, 29, 102-119.
Jenkins, J.R. & O'Connor, R.E. (2002). Early identification and intervention for young children with reading/learning disabilities. In R. Bradley, L. Danielson, & D.P. Hallahan (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 99-149). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Jimenez, J.E., Siegel, L.S., & Lopez, M.R. (2003). The relationship between IQ and reading disabilities in English-speaking Canadian and Spanish children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 15-23.
Kaplan, E., Fein, D., Kramer, J., Delis, D., & Morris, R. (1999). The WISC-III as a process instrument. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
Kaufman, A.S., & Kaufman, N.L. (Eds.). (2001). Specific learning disabilities and difficulties in children and adolescents: Psychological assessment and evaluation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Kavale, K.A. (1987). Theoretical issues surrounding severe discrepancy. Learning Disabilities Research, 3, 12-20.
Kavale, K.A. (1995). Setting the record straight on learning disabilities and low achievement: The tortuous path of ideology. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 10, 145-152.
Kavale, K.A. (2002). Discrepancy models in the identification of learning disability. In R. Bradley, L. Danielson, & D.P. Hallahan (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 369-426). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kavale, K.A., & Forness, S.R. (1984). A meta-analysis of the validity of Wechsler Scale profiles and recategorizations: Patterns or parodies? Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 136-156.
Kavale, K.A. & Forness, S.R. (1985a). Learning disability and the history of science: Paradigm or paradox? Remedial and Special Education, 6, 12-23.
Kavale, K.A. & Forness, S.R. (1985b). The science of learning disabilities. San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press.
Kavale, K.A. & Forness, S.R. (1995). The nature of learning disabilities: Critical elements of diagnosis and classification. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kavale, K.A. & Forness, S.R. (1998). The politics of learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 21, 245-273.
Kavale, K.A. & Forness, S.R. (2000). What definitions of learning disability say and don't say: A critical analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 239-256.
Kavale, K.A. & Forness, S.R. (2003). Learning disability as a discipline. In H.L. Swanson, K.R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 76-93). New York: Guilford Press.
Kavale, K.A. & Nye, C. (1985-1986). Parameters of learning disabilities in achievement, linguistic, neuropsychological, and social/behavioral domains. Journal of Special Education, 19, 443-458.
Kavale, K.A. & Nye, C. (1991). The structure of learning disabilities. Exceptionality, 2, 141-156.
Kavale, K.A., Forness, S.R., & Lorsbach, T.C. (1991). Definition for definitions of learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 257-266.
Kavale, K.A., Fuchs, D., & Scruggs, T.E. (1994). Setting the record straight on learning disabilities and low achievement. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 9, 70-77.
Keogh, B.K. (1994). A matrix of decision points in the measurement of learning disabilities. In G.R. Lyon (Ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on assessment issues (pp. 15-26). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
Klatt, H.J. (1991). Learning disabilities: A questionable construct. Educational Theory, 41, 47-60.
Konold, T.R. (1999). Evaluating discrepancy analyses with the WISC-III and WIAT. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 17, 24-35.
Lerner, J.W. (1975). Remedial reading and learning disabilities: Are they the same or different? Journal of Special Education, 9, 119-131.
Lester, G., & Kelman, M. (1997). State disparities in the diagnosis and placement of pupils with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 599-607.
Lloyd, J.W. (2002). There's more to identifying learning disability than discrepancy. In R. Bradley, L. Danielson, & D.P. Hallahan (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 427-435). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lopez, M.F., Forness, S.R., MacMillan, D.L., Bocian, K.M., & Gresham, F.M. (1998). Children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and emotional or behavioral disorders in primary grades: Inappropriate placement in the learning disorder category. Education and Treatment of Children, 19, 286-299.
Lovitt, T.C., & Cushing, S. (1999). Parents of youth with disabilities: Their perceptions of school programs. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 134-142.
MacMillan, D.L. & Siperstein, G.N. (2002). Learning disabilities as operationally defined by schools. In R. Bradley, L. Danielson, & D.P. Hallahan (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 287-333). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
MacMillan, D.L., Gresham, F.M., & Bocian, K.M. (1998). Discrepancy between definitions of learning disabilities and school practices: An empirical investigation. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 314-326.
MacMillan, D.L., Gresham, F.M., Bocian, K.M., & Lambros, K.M. (1998). Current plight of borderline students: Where do they belong? Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 33, 83-94.
MacMillan, D.L., Siperstein, G.N., & Gresham, F.M. (1996). A challenge to the viability of mild mental retardation as a diagnostic category. Exceptional Children, 62, 356-371.
McEvoy, A., & Welker, R. (2000). Antisocial behavior, academic failure, and school climate: A critical review. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 8, 130-140.
McKnight, R.T. (1982). The learning disability myth in American education. Journal of Education, 164, 351-359.
Meehl, P.E. (1954). Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Mercer, C.D., Jordan, L., Allsopp, D.H., & Mercer, A.R. (1996). Learning disabilities definitions and criteria used by state education departments. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 217-232.
Morison, P., White, S.H., & Fever, M.J. (Eds.). The use of IQ tests in special education decision making and planning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Naglieri, J. (2001). Do ability and reading achievement correlate? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 304-306.
Naglieri, J.A. (2003). Current advances in assessment and intervention for children with learning disabilities. In T.E. Scruggs & M.A. Mastropieri (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities: Identification and assessment (Vol. 16, pp. 163-190). Oxford, England: Elsevier Science.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. (NIH Publication No. 00-4754). Washington, DC: National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development.
Norman, C.A., & Zigmond, N. (1980). Characteristics of children labeled and served as learning disabled in school systems affiliated with Child Service Demonstration Centers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 13, 542-547.
Peterson, K.M.H., & Shinn, M.R. (2002). Sever discrepancy models: Which best explains school identification practices for learning disabilities? School Psychology Review, 31(4), 459-476.
Pressley, M., Allington, R. (1999). What should reading instructional research be the research of? Issues in education: Contributions from Educational Psychology, 5, 1-35.
Reynolds, C.R. (1985). Measuring the aptitude-achievement discrepancy in learning disability diagnosis. Remedial and Special Education, 6, 37-55.
Scruggs, T.E., & Mastropieri, M.A. (2002). On babies and bathwater: Addressing the problems of identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 25, 155-168.
Shepard, L.A. (1980). An evaluation of the regression discrepancy method for identifying children with learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 14, 79-91.
Shepard, L.A., & Smith, M.L. (1983). An evaluation of the identification of learning disabled students in Colorado. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6, 115-127.
Siegel, L.S. (1989). IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 469-478, 486.
Siegel, L.S. (2003). IQ-discrepancy definitions and the diagnosis of LD: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 2-3.
Singer, J., Palfrey, J., Butter, J., & Walker, D. (1989). Variation in special education classification across school districts: How does where you live affect what you are labeled? American Educational Research Journal, 26, 261-281.
Speece, D.L., Case, L.P., & Molloy, D.E. (2003). Responsiveness to general education instruction as the first gate to learning disabilities identification. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18, 147-156.
Stanovich, K.E. (1991). Discrepancy definitions of reading disability: Has intelligence led us astray? Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 7-29.
Strauss, S.L. (2001). An open letter to Reid Lyon. Educational Researcher, 30, 26-33.
Stuebing, K.K., Fletcher, J.M., LeDoux, J.M., Lyon, G.R., Shaywitz, S.E., & Shaywitz, B.A. (2002). Validity of IQ-discrepancy classifications of reading difficulties: A meta-analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 39, 469-518.
Swanson, H.L. (1999). Has the importance of phonological awareness training been greatly overstated? Issues in Education: Contributions from Educational Psychology, 5, 125-139.
Swanson, H.L. & Alexander, J.E. (1997). Cognitive processes as predictors of word recognition and reading comprehension in learning-disabled and skilled readers: Revisiting the specificity hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 128-158.
Torgesen, J.K. (1979). What shall we do with psychological processes? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 12, 514-521.
Torgesen, J.K. (2002). Empirical and theoretical support for direct diagnosis of learning disabilities by assessment of intrinsic processing weaknesses. In R. Bradley, L. Danielson, & D.P. Hallahan (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 565-613). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Troia, G.A. (1999). Phonological awareness intervention research: A critical review of the experimental methodology. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 28-52.
U.S. Office of Education (1977, December 29). Assistance to states for education of handicapped children: Procedures for evaluating specific learning disabilities. Federal Register, 42, (250), 65082-65085. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Vaughn, S. & Fuchs, L.S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential problems. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18, 137-146.
Vaughn, S., Gersten, R., & Chard, D.J. (2000). The underlying message in LD intervention research: Findings from research syntheses. Exceptional Children, 67, 99-114.
Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M., & Lyon, G.R. (2000). Differentiating between difficult-to- remediate and readily remediated poor readers: More evidence against the IQ-achievement discrepancy definition of reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 223-238.
Wilson, L.R., & Cone, T. (1984). The regression equation method for determining academic discrepancy. Journal of School Psychology, 22, 95-110.
Wolf, M. & Bowers, P.G. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 415-438.
Wong, B.Y.L. (1996). The ABCs of learning disabilities. New York: Academic Press.
Ysseldyke, J.E., Algozzine, B., & Richey, L. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: How many children are handicapped? Exceptional Children, 48, 531-534.
Ysseldyke, J.E., Algozzine, B., Shinn, M.R., & McGue, M. (1982). Similarities and differences between low achievers and students classified learning disabled. Journal of Special Education, 16, 73-85.
Previous Page
(Conclusion)
