Responsiveness-to-Intervention Symposium

December 4-5, 2003 * Kansas City, Missouri

The National Research Center on Learning Disabilities sponsored this two-day symposium focusing on responsiveness-to-intervention (RTI) issues. The speakers, discussants, and participants assembled represented the wide diversity of individuals with a vested interest in LD determination issues. Advocates, instructional staff, researchers, and state-level education officials brought their collective and considerable expertise to the discussions.

Frank R. Vellutino of the University at Albany presented this invited paper during the symposium. For links to other papers and materials, visit the main Symposium 2003 page.


Response to Intervention as a Vehicle for Distinguishing
Between Reading Disabled and Non-Reading Disabled Children:
Evidence for the Role of Kindergarten and First Grade Intervention

Previous Page | Next Page
Table of Contents | Introduction

Abstract

In the present paper, we discuss results from a kindergarten and first grade intervention study that extend results from a first grade intervention study reported by Vellutino et al., (1996). Children at risk for early reading difficulties were identified on entry into kindergarten and half of these children received small group intervention two to three times a week during their kindergarten year. The other half received whatever remedial assistance was offered by their home schools. These children were again assessed at the beginning of first grade and those who continued to have difficulties in reading received either one-to-one daily tutoring offered by project teachers from the beginning to the end of first grade or whatever remedial assistance was offered by their home schools over the same time period. All target children were periodically assessed through the end of third grade. Results suggest that either kindergarten intervention alone or kindergarten intervention combined with first grade intervention are both useful vehicles for preventing early and long-term reading difficulties in most at risk children and for identifying children who will need more protracted remedial assistance to help them acquire functional literacy skills. Implications of the findings for operationalizing response to intervention to diagnose reading disability were discussed.

Previous Page | Next Page
Table of Contents | Introduction

IDEAs that Work logo

The symposium was made possible by the support of the U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs. Renee Bradley, Project Officer. Opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the position of the U.S. Department of Education.